The Differences between Construction Litigation and Construction Arbitration

Courtesy-prowsechowne

Disputes happen on a daily in any industry. When it comes to construction industry, construction litigation and arbitration are disputes which are solved between the involved parties. Construction arbitration is a dispute which can be solved with the help of a mediator, while construction litigation disputes can be solved with the help of a lawyer inside a courtroom. Let’s see a few differences between the 2 disputes.

  1. Based on Evidence – With the help of a mediator, the dispute for construction arbitration can be solved. 0n the other hand, construction litigation disputes are solved inside the courtroom with the help of a lawyer. Moreover, evidence is passed on for the judge to study it and only then pass on their verdict based on the outcome.
  2. Based on Price – Construction mediator charge different fees based on their experience. While construction litigation issues require assistance of a lawyer and the fees are slightly higher. However, the disputes for construction litigation are solved in a much better manner since the law is involved.
  3. Based on Appeals – Since construction litigation disputes are solved inside a courtroom, even the losing party has a chance to apply for appeals. While the same cannot be said for construction arbitration where confusions are bound to happen.
  4. Based on Speed – As construction litigation issues are solved inside a courtroom, the dispute to be solved takes more time. On the other hand, construction arbitration disputes require less time since the matter is small.

Regardless of the disputes are required to be solved, hiring a lawyer from the best construction law firms is the way to go.